The Ishmael Connection?

images (3).jpeg

Some of us will be amazed to know that the popular idea that Ishmael was a Muslim and the ancestor of Muhammad is based on speculation. The only “proof” Muslims present is the Biblical account of how Abraham sent Hagar away with her son Ishmael.

During this journey, there was no more water, and while Hagar wept, an angel of God beckoned to her, showing her a well from which she gave Ishmael a drink. God also promised her that his race would be a great nation (Gen. 21:5, 8-19).

Most Christians have assumed a link between Ishmael and Islam and therefore needlessly blame him and Abraham for the menace of Islam in the Middle East today. This is why we all need to be better informed.

Like several other Bible stories, the Quran and Hadiths altered the scenery of the Hagar and Ishmael story from Israel to Mecca.

While the Bible says Hagar “wandered in the desert of Beersheba,” the hadith claims Abraham left Hagar and Ishmael near the Kaaba in Mecca under a tree.

Abraham is even said to pray to Allah at the Kaaba before returning home! It claims that Hagar ran up and down the hills of Mecca – Safa and Marwa – seven times, seeking water for Ishmael before an angel showed her the well of Zamzam where she got some water.

Islamic records however admit that the Kaaba, the two hills and the Zamzam well were pagan “holy” sites where pre-Islamic Arab pagans worshipped their deities including Allah. Abraham was never a stone-worshipper.

1. Abraham, Hagar and Ishmael were never in Mecca. Ishmael lived “in the Desert of Paran, his mother got a wife for him from Egypt” (Gen. 21:21).

Hagar herself was an Egyptian, not an Arabian (“Now Sarai, Abram’s wife, had borne him no children. But she had an Egyptian slave named Hagar” – Genesis 16:1).

Is Paran located in Mecca? No. The Israelites travelled from the desert of Sinai to rest “in the desert of Paran” (Num. 10:13) “and encamped in the desert of Paran” (Num. 12:16). In fact, “Moses sent them out from the desert of Paran” (13:3).

If Paran is in Mecca, that means the Israelites travelled from Sinai to Mecca to and fro for 40 years! Of course, that would be absurd.

2. Abraham lived in Hebron and died there (Gen. 25:9). If he had lived in Mecca as Muslims fondly imagine, that means Ishmael had to travel about 1,200 km from his home in Paran to Mecca to bury his father with Isaac.

Bear in mind also that Ishmael’s descendants “settled in the area from Havilah to Shur, near the border of Egypt, as you go towards Asshur…” (Gen. 25:18). They lived near Egypt, thousands of miles away from Mecca.

3. Perhaps seeing the geographical impossibility of Abraham living in Mecca, a Muslim biographer invented the idea of Ishmael using a “flying camel” to travel whenever he wanted to visit Abraham (Tarikh al-Tabari 1:165).

Islam has been fabricating stories right from its inception, so this is not new.

4. There is a wide gap of 2,670 years between Ishmael and Muhammad. If we take the average lifespan of an Arab – based on Islamic traditions – as 70, it would take about 133 generations to produce a genealogical link between Ishmael and Muhammad.

Muslim biographer, Ibn Ishaq, attempted to fabricate a genealogy for Muhammad, but he could only come up with 40 generations. What about the 93 “missing links?”

Even the names he made up were all 8th century Islamic names not related to any ancient documentation. Yet, his work is the major “proof” Muslims present to forge a link between Muhammad and Ishmael or Abraham.

Islamic scholar, Alfred Guillaume, agrees that “there is no historical evidence for the assertion that Abraham or Ishmael was ever in Mecca and if there have been such a tradition, it would have to be explained how all the memory of the old Semitic name Ishmael (which was not true Arabian form in Arabian inscription…) came to be lost” (Islam, 1956, pp. 61-62).

5. Some of Ishmael’s descendants may have migrated to Arab nations, but some historians argue that Mecca probably didn’t exist until the Yemenite immigrants colonized it in 4th century AD.

According to a reference work:

“There is a prevalent notion that the Arabs, both of the south and north, are descended from Ishmael; and the passage in Gen. xvi.12, “he (Ishmael) shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren,” is often cited as if it were a prediction of that national independence which, upon the whole, the Arabs have maintained more than any other people. But this supposition is founded on a misconception of the original Hebrew, which runs literally, “he shall before the faces of all his brethren,” i.e., (according to the idiom above explained, in which “before the face” denotes the east), the habitation of his posterity shall be “to the east” of the settlements of Abraham’s’ other descendants

“The idea of the southern Arabs being of the posterity of Ishmael is entirely without foundation, and seems to have originated in the tradition invented by Arab vanity that they, as well as the Jews, are of the seed of Abraham – a vanity which, besides disfiguring and falsifying the whole history of the patriarch and his son has transferred the scene of it from Palestine to Mecca … The vast tracts of country known to us under the name of Arabia gradually became peopled by a variety of tribes of different lineage” (McClintock and Strong’s Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature Vol. 1:339).

The Akkadians, Assyrians or Hittites who weren’t Abraham’s descendants, could have been the progenitors of the Arabs. Even the Encyclopedia of Islam traces the Arabs to non-Abrahamic origins (1:543-547).

The Dictionary of Islam also questions the whole idea that the Arabs are Ishmael’s descendants (page 18).

The Abrahamic or Ishmaelite link with Islam is not tenable. This is no surprise, however, for the Quran and Hadiths are fraudulent and dubious as far as history of Bible characters are concerned.