A Critique of “the Gospel of Barnabas”

The caption was framed to gain attention “1500 Year Old Bible Confirms that Jesus Christ was not Crucified.” Muslims shamelessly embellished an article claiming that the gospel of Barnabas was discovered in Turkey containing the “scary truths” that Jesus is not the Son of God; was not crucified; apostle Paul was an impostor and Muhammad was a prophet of God. Read what the original article here

The gospel of Barnabas (first published in the 1970s in Pakistan) was alleged to be the “lost book” of the Bible written by Barnabas, a disciple of Christ 2000 years ago. In it we find Jesus say to him “Be not sore grieved Barnabas for those whom God hath chosen before the creation of the world shall not perish” (p 21).

This is a patent forgery. Barnabas was one of the apostles after Jesus ascended to heaven. He was not even called Barnabas until when he gave his field to the apostles. (Acts 4:36).

It says: “Others preached that he [Jesus] really died but rose again. Others preached, and yet preach that Jesus is the Son of God, among whom is Paul deceived” (p 273)

This is also false. Barnabas was the one who went to the great extent of showing the early Church that Paul (who was formerly an enemy) was a true Christian (Acts 9:27). When the church in Antioch was growing, the church in Jerusalem sent Barnabas there to instruct the new believers, but he rather chose to go to Asia Minor to assist Paul (Acts 11:26). Both men returned to Antioch together (Acts 12:35) and Barnabas proclaimed Jesus as the Son of God (Acts 13:33).

When the issue of circumcision as a condition for salvation came up among Jewish Christians, both Paul and Barnabas repudiated the doctrine (Acts 15:1-2). The only disagreement they had was the decision to take Mark with them (vs 38-40) and it was resolved later as the epistles shows (Col. 4:10, 2Tim. 4:11). What a shame that the author of the gospel of Barnabas chose a wrong name to use for his forgeries.

The “gospel” calls Jesus “the Christ” on pg 2, yet denies Jesus as the Messiah. Its writer didn’t know both titles are the same. The book exposes itself as a late work when it quotes from the Latin Vulgate (translated in 405 AD) and makes reference to “the golden jubilee” which was invented by Pope Boniface around 1300 AD (p 104). That implies that the book of Barnabas dates to 700 years after Muhammad.

The gospel of Barnabas plagiarized the works of Dante, a Medieval Italian poet. His descriptions of hell, paradise and purgatory in his book, Divina Comedia was smoothly plagiarized. The expression “Moses, his servants and go and serve false and lying gods” (p 27) was directly lifted from Dante’s Inferno (1:72).

Pg. 21 reads: “Behold then how beautiful is the world in summer time when all things bear fruits. The very peasant, intoxicated with gladness by reason of the harvest…maketh the valley and mountains resound with singing

The background described here fits that of Medieval western Europe (Italy/Spain) in summer, not that of Palestine where rain falls in winter and fields are parched in summer. The “gospel” says wines are stored in wine casks (p 196). But in first century Palestine, wines were stored in skins (Matt 9:17). Wooden casks were used in medieval Europe.

It also says that Mary, Martha and Lazarus were overlords of two towns – Bethany and Magdala. (p 242) The concept of feudalism was a medieval European custom. At the time of Christ, much of Palestine was controlled by the Romans. In pg 71, the book quotes Jesus saying “60 mites.” This is ridiculous because mites are coins of Spanish origin. Evidently this “gospel” was a late European islamic forgery.

The book makes some wild-eyed claims like claiming that Romans stirred up 600,000 Jews against 200,000 Jews over the case of Jesus (p 115). Jews were not up to that number in the first century.
Interestingly, the gospel of Barnabas contradicts even the Quran. It says Jesus is not the Messiah but Muhammad is (p 54), but the Quran says Jesus is the Messiah (Q 3:45). The Quran says there are “seven heavens” (2:29) while the book says “the heavens are nine” (p 223).

On page 5, the book, reflecting medieval Catholic belief in the painless birth of Christ says: “The Virgin was surrounded by a light exceeding bright and brought forth hers son without pain” But the Quran says: “And the pangs of childbirth drove her [Mary] unto the trunk of the palm tree” (Sura 19:23). No Muslim can believe both books.

It says angels will die on the last day (p 70) while the Quran says 8 angels will carry Allah’s throne on that day (69:15-17). The Quran says that men will still be alive on the last day (80:33-37), but this book says “every living thing shall die” at that time (p 70). Dear Muslims, you can’t have it both ways. This book is utterly spurious.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s